Where the information came from

Follow every important claim to its source.

The register contains 52 research, legal, court-data, documentary, and design sources, plus separately credited public-domain photographs. Official court records, laws, government data, original research, and first-party standards receive priority.

How to read the register

A source may support one sentence without supporting the entire FJP proposal. Each entry explains what we used it for and what it cannot establish. “Jurisdiction” means the court system and law that apply; “sample” means the people or cases included in a study. More terms explained →

A link is not an endorsement.

Each source supports a limited claim. Its location, method, sample, publication status, and limits stay attached. Dates below are publication or current-version dates where identifiable; research current through 14 September 2026.

Download the source register as a spreadsheet-ready CSV →

S11 · Final judgment · ECHR · 2015

M. and M. v. Croatia, Application no. 10161/13

Custody delay, allegations of ill-treatment, child participation, representation, and state response. Includes nuance about steps authorities did take.

S12 · U.S. Supreme Court · 2011

Turner v. Rogers, 564 U.S. 431

Due-process safeguards when ability to pay is a critical issue in civil-contempt incarceration. Does not establish automatic counsel in every case.

S13 · U.S. Supreme Court · 1996

M.L.B. v. S.L.J., 519 U.S. 102

Access to appellate review after parental-rights termination could not be conditioned on prepayment of record fees.

S15 · Legislative record · New York · 2025–2026

New York Senate Bill S5998B, Kyra’s Law

Sponsor memorandum and bill text. The Assembly reported passage by both chambers in June 2026; this register does not call it enacted without a later official enactment record.

S23 · Privacy risk framework

NIST Privacy Framework

Voluntary privacy-risk management framework. General reference, not a family-court implementation specification.

S26 · Statute · Illinois

750 ILCS 5/508, Attorney’s fees

Fee awards and consequences for improper-purpose hearings, including harassment, unnecessary delay, or needless cost.

S29 · Meta-analysis · Persuasion design · 2015

Tannenbaum et al., Appealing to Fear

127 papers, 248 independent samples, 27,372 participants. Threat messages had greater average effect when paired with efficacy information; not specific to legal reform campaigns.

S30 · Web credibility study · 2001

Fogg et al., What Makes Web Sites Credible?

Study of more than 1,400 participants; credibility factors included real-world feel, usability, expertise, trustworthiness, and tailoring. Older study; used as a baseline design reference.

S31 · Civic-technology study · 2017

Rumbul et al., The design of civic technology

Mixed-methods study emphasizing ease of participation, reduced process complexity, conversation, emotion, feedback, and community. Context-specific.

S36 · U.S. Supreme Court · 1982

Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745

Due process requires at least clear and convincing evidence before a state permanently terminates parental rights.

S37 · State high court · New York · 2004

Nicholson v. Scoppetta, 3 N.Y.3d 357

Domestic-violence exposure is not presumptively neglect or grounds for removal; courts must assess imminent risk, context, alternatives, and removal harm.

S41 · Family-court implementation initiative · United States · 2025

NCSC, Courts selected for family case management initiative

Official description of a 12-court initiative using training, tools, triage, tracking, data coaching, and peer learning without requiring wholesale system replacement. It does not evaluate or endorse FJP.

S42 · Court technology lifecycle guidance · United States · 2026

NCSC, Managing court technology

Current collection of planning, procurement, implementation, evaluation, accessibility, security, and responsible-exit guidance for court technology. General implementation reference; not an FJP specification.

S43 · Federal civil-rights guidance · United States · updated 2023

U.S. Department of Justice, Language Access in State Courts

Official federal guidance explaining meaningful language access in state courts. Used to identify inclusive access as an implementation requirement, not as a complete accessibility standard.

S44 · Documentary · director’s description · 2016–2017

Cassie Jaye, The Red Pill

First-party description of the film as an exploration of the Men’s Rights Movement and gender inequality from men’s perspectives. Establishes the film’s framing, not the accuracy of each interview claim.

S45 · Documentary · Gravitas Ventures release

The Red Pill, full film via YouTube Movies & TV

Primary audiovisual source for the documentary’s content. Personal accounts and statistics in the film remain attributed claims unless separately verified.

S49 · Experimental vignette research · 2019

Costa et al., Gender stereotypes underlie child custody decisions

Across tightly matched hypothetical cases, participants allocated more custody to good mothers than good fathers; shared-custody endorsement reduced the difference. Vignettes test judgment under controlled conditions, not actual U.S. court outcomes.

S50 · Federal district-court order · Michigan · 2017

Alexander v. Michigan, No. 2:16-cv-11385, Document 22

Records a 1989 default filiation and support order, later felony non-support proceedings, 2013 DNA exclusion, and 2015 dismissal of the felony case. The later civil suit was dismissed on jurisdiction, standing, and immunity grounds; the order did not find systemic anti-male bias.

S51 · U.S. Supreme Court · 1981

Little v. Streater, 452 U.S. 1

Held that denying an indigent alleged father state-funded blood testing in the specific paternity proceeding violated due process because it denied a meaningful opportunity to be heard.

S52 · Court implementation report · Maryland · 2025

NCSC Trends in State Courts 2025, family mediation and abuse screening

Describes Maryland’s response to inconsistent and incomplete family-mediation abuse screening, including expansion to coercive control and a pilot of an empirically validated tool. It is an implementation account, not an evaluation of FJP.